Massimo's other ramblings can be found at his
Skeptic Web.
Massimo's books:


|
This column can be posted for free on any appropriate web site and
reprinted in hard copy by permission. If you are interested in receiving the
html code or the text, please send an
email.
N. 40, August 2003
Are we afraid of the wrong things?
I have an acquaintance of mine who tells me that he is worried whenever I
get on a plane (which is more often than most people, though I’m not a
golden level frequent flier). You know the reasoning: those things (the
planes) are heavier than air; we were not meant to be flying thousands of
feet above the earth; surely you heard about how the airlines are cutting on
maintenance because of increasing costs; etc., etc., etc.
Interestingly, this same friend of mine is not the least bit concerned about
the fact that in order to get to the airport I have to drive on a road,
Alcoa Highway, that the locals have nicknamed “I’ll Kill Ya Highway” because
of the high number of accidents. Never mind that the statistics clearly say
that riding a car is much more dangerous than being on a plane, that if we
were meant to do anything, that probably did not include racing at 60 miles
an hour on asphalt, and that there is not an iota of evidence showing that
airlines have been slacking on repairs (to the contrary, study after study
shows that the airline industry -- including commuter planes -- has become
increasingly safe over the past decades).
Are we afraid of the wrong things? That is certainly the thesis of
University of Southern California’s sociologist Barry Glassner, whose The
Culture of Fear: Why Americans are Afraid of the Wrong Things should be
mandatory reading for people like my friend. Glassner makes an interesting
point, and backs it up with tons of anecdotal as well as statistical
evidence. We are more afraid of terrorism than of dying of ill effects
caused by the operations of our own industries, and yet the latter is a much
higher cause of death than the former. We are convinced by the media that it
is very dangerous for anybody to walk city streets because of “random”
crime. But, as Glassner points out, violent crime is anything but random:
just consider that a black man is 18 times more likely to be murdered than a
white woman.
The examples can be multiplied almost endlessly, but a regular pattern
emerges. We tend to be afraid of things that are constantly in the news,
even though the media have a stake in ratings (and therefore in
high-emotional impact stories), not necessarily in informing us. We tend to
be unduly impressed by personal stories, either recounted by people we know
or broadcasted by talk shows, and often lack the overall frame of reference
to reasonably interpret those stories. Surely there are genuine examples of,
say, the IRS “persecuting” some poor chap well beyond the boundaries of
reasonableness. But does that constitute a pattern of abuse of ordinary
Americans by the tax people? More importantly, does that require a special
Congressional investigation, and perhaps passing laws to curb such ghastly
abuses of power? Maybe, but the answer is to be found in independent
investigations of the problem based on large numbers of cases, not on the
occasional horror story, as regrettable or even worrisome (nobody wishes to
become the next “anecdote”) as that may be.
Is there a national conspiracy by the media, the government, and the
military-industrial complex to keep Americans worried about the wrong
things? Hmm, yes and no. On the one hand, it is simply natural for human
beings to respond emotionally to personal stories and to yawn when faced
with statistical analyses. It is also understandable, if borderline
unethical, of the media to go for the gory aspects of life, as
unrepresentative of reality as they may be, rather than for the more mundane
but more relevant ones. Glassner even suggests that perhaps we tend to fear
the wrong things because they neatly substitute fears of things for which we
either can’t do much about or are in fact partly guilty of. For example, it
may be that an obsessive interest in the relatively few cases of children
killed by their mothers makes us feel better about our own deficiencies in
our everyday exercise of the same role (along the lines of “well, at least
I’m not as bad a parent as that”).
On the other hand, think of the recent and still unfolding story about
President Bush “doctoring” the truth about Iraq’s nuclear program and why
the US went to war. (I’m sure that if it were Clinton denying having
received a blow job in the oval office we would not be ashamed of using the
word “lying,” and perhaps even of thinking out loud about impeachment.) That
one does indeed seem a case of the Government purposely manipulating our
feelings for rather sinister ends.
Do we have a defense against being afraid of the wrong things? Can we hope
to channel our fears where they belong? (After all, fear is a genuinely
useful reaction, if directed to genuine threats.) Yes, but the answer is
going to make you yawn and wishing to turn the page or jumping into another
area of cyber space. The answer is slow, painful, continuous education of
ourselves. A process that is mostly up to us, that requires reading widely
and discussing openly, that can eat into your TV or golf time, and that
would make you more sociable only with the NPR-listening crowd. Then again,
perhaps the greatest responsibility of the citizens of a democracy is
exactly to educate themselves, if nothing else in preparation for the next
trip to the voting booth
|